Mitigating Climate Change to Adaptation and the Preservation of Natural Heritage.

Qualitative and quantitative description of the alternatives:

 

Quantitative and qualitative information related to alternatives

Criteria describing the alternatives

*

Units

The weighting (weighting factor)

Compared alternatives

Afforestation

Reforestation

Wildlife conservation

Deforestation

Revegetation

Durability

+

Units

0,175

5

5

6

3

7

Low Cost

+

Units

0.1

7

10

8

5

5

Health & Safety

+

Units

0.65

7

10

9

7

5

Private & Public sectors

-

Units

12:16

4

7

5

5

6

* - The symbol + (-) indicates that the higher (lower) value of the criterion corresponds to the greater significance of the customer (stakeholders)

 

Quantitative and qualitative information related to alternatives

Criteria describing the alternatives

*

Units

The weighting (weighting factor)

Compared alternative 
possibility to improve the analysis criteria% 
Possible alternatives to increase the market value of%, influenced by the above criterion increases the value of

Afforestation

Reforestation

Wildlife conservation

Deforestation

Revegetation

Durability

+

Units

0,175


(80%) 
(5.1151%)


(80%) 
(5.1151%)


(50%) 
(3.1969%)

3

(20%)

(12.7877%)


(28.57%) 
(1.8268%)

Low Cost

+

Units

0.1


(42.86%) 
(1.5658%)

10 
(0%) 
(0%)


(25%) 
(0.9134%)

5

(100%)

(3.65536%)


(100%) 
(3.6536%)

Health & Safety

+

Units

0.65


(42.86%) 
(10 178%)


10 
(0%) 
(0%)


(11.11%) 
(2.6387%)

7

(42.86%)

(10.178%)


(100%) 
(23.7486%)

Private & Public sectors

-

Units

12:16


(0%) 
(0%)


(42.86%) 
(2.5053%)


(20%) 
(1.1692%)

5

(20%)

(1.1692%)


(33.33%) 
(1.9486%)

* - The symbol + (-) indicates that the higher (lower) value of the criterion corresponds to the greater significance of the customer (stakeholders)